P = average[TPR for C1-C4] - average[FPR for C1-C4]
A summary of the results in spreadsheet form can be found here. Assuming you solve the segmentation problem, random guessing results in an accuracy of 25% (forced choice on the four non-background classes).Participant | Algorithm | Train | Dev | Eval | |||
|
|||||||
Kane, Zach (2022 Spring) | K-MEANS (KMN) | 30.98% | 30.34% | 38.94% | |||
Kane, Zach (2022 Spring) | Autoencoder (AUT) | 29.86% | 29.47% | 32.45% | |||
Samarco, Michael (2022 Spring) | ConvNet (CNN) | 60.66% | 60.07% | 60.61% | |||
Samarco, Michael (2022 Spring) | Random Forest (RNF) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | |||
Bici, Daniel (2022 Spring) | TBD (TBD) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | |||
Bici, Daniel (2022 Spring) | TBD (TBD) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | |||
Cassell, Joshua (2022 Spring) | TBD (TBD) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | |||
Cassell, Joshua (2022 Spring) | TBD (TBD) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | |||
Khantan, Mehdi (2022 Spring) | TBD (TBD) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | |||
Khantan, Mehdi (2022 Spring) | TBD (TBD) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | |||
Rahman, Nazia (2022 Spring) | TBD (TBD) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | |||
Rahman, Nazia (2022 Spring) | TBD (TBD) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | |||
Sand, Richard (2022 Spring) | TBD (TBD) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | |||
Sand, Richard (2022 Spring) | TBD (TBD) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | |||
Vadimsky, Dakota (2022 Spring) | TBD (TBD) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | |||
Vadimsky, Dakota (2022 Spring) | TBD (TBD) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | |||
Zhao, Keren (2022 Spring) | TBD (TBD) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | |||
Zhao, Keren (2022 Spring) | TBD (TBD) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |