"ver 1.0"
by James Lavin

I have compiled a list of useful proof techniques for you, my fellow first-years, to assist you in proving results on the challenging problem sets we are confronting this year. If you have any comments or suggestions, please email me. Enjoy!

          

    METHODS OF CONFUSION: PROOF BY OBFUSCATION If you write with the intent of confusing the reader, you may succeed. Since the grader cannot pinpoint where your answer deviates from the correct answer, she cannot mark your answer "wrong." PROOF BY HANDWAVING Very similar to obfuscation, but this approach at least attempts to SOUND like a proof. PROOF BY JARGON If you write as if you know what you are talking about, you may convince the reader that you are more knowledgeable than they are. They will then be afraid to disagree or mark your answer "wrong." PROOF BY ILLEGIBILITY If the grader cannot read your answer, how can it be wrong? PROOF BY SATURATION If you write a many-page "proof", no one will bother to check. PROOF BY CONDENSATION The opposite of saturation. You write an extremely terse proof in which you skip many steps (thereby avoiding the necessity of proving them!). METHODS OF WISHFUL THINKING PROOF BY INTUITION If it feels good, go with it. PROOF BY REPUTATION Any idea you have ever had has already been thought of by Ken Arrow. Since Arrow is always right, your idea must be true too. [I must acknowledge Ron B. as the source of this brilliant piece of logic! PROOF BY PRAYER If you pray that something is true, God might answer your prayer. PROOF BY INEBRIATION (OR HALLUCINATION) Everything always looks better when you're drunk. PROOF BY SELF-DEPRECATION Think to yourself: "I've proven this to be false, but I am ALWAYS wrong, so it MUST be true!" PROOF BY ANALOGY "A quasi-concave function is LIKE a concave function, so..." PROOF BY EXASPERATION If you stare at a partial, incorrect proof long enough, it slowly looks more and more like a complete, correct proof. PROOF BY ASSUMPTION If your assumptions are invalid, then your results are invalid too, so you might as well assume what you want to prove. This saves time and frustration. PROOF BY CONSENSUS If everyone in the study group agrees, then it's got to be true! PROOF BY INTIMIDATION Threaten the listener/reader/grader with serious consequences if she disagrees (or speak in a threatening manner). [E.g., Raphael vs. Murat... "This is BOGUS!"] PROOF BY TRIVIALIZATION How many times have you read in a textbook, "It is obvious that..." or "It can easily be shown that..." or, "The attentive reader will understand that..." It is no coincidence that these statements are always made about the most difficult concepts in the book. The author) could not prove them, so they trivialized them. It's a very effective technique with widespread application and makes you look very, very smart in the process! PROOF BY SUPPOSITION Suppose that the statement you are trying to prove is true. Try to show a contradiction. If you cannot, then the statement must be true! METHODS OF CHEATING PROOF BY UPPER-YEAR STUDENTS Consult your favorite upper-year student who has been through the course already. PROOF BY LAST YEAR'S ANSWER SET Superior to consulting upper-year students, but useful only if they have bothered to save their notes. The more confusing the class, the more likely they are to have burned their notes. PROOF BY PROOF Just find the result in a book somewhere and copy it. METHODS OF TRANSFORMATION If you get a result that you don't like, there are a few special techniques which you might use to transform your intermediate result into more desirable final result. These methods are applicable only in special cases, but when they work, they can be a powerful method of proof: PROOF BY INTERPOLATION: If you do two proofs and get two different answers and the answer that you want lies in between, just take the appropriate convex combination. PROOF BY PARENTHESES: Let's say that you have reduced the proof to solving the equation 3 + 14 + 1 = 20. It may seem that you are stuck, but if you are observant, you will notice that adding parentheses will solve the problem: (3 + 1)(4+1) = 20 PROOF BY TRANSFORMATION: This encompasses a few cases. If you get X=2 and you need X=10, just switch to base 2. Or, if you get X=0 and you need X=1, just exponentiate. [These may seem to have limited application, but since many proofs yield X=0 or X=1, the ability to switch between them by taking logs or antilogs is a very useful technique!] PROOF BY SIGN CHANGE Just multiply one side of the equation by -1. PROOF BY ELIMINATION Just cross out any troublesome terms. METHODS OF DELAY PROOF BY MATURATION Just tell the grader that you will prove this later when you are older and wiser. PROOF BY FERMAT "I had an elegant little proof of this, but this paper is not large enough to write it down..." PROOF BY TIME CONSTRAINT When you absolutely must turn in the problem set, your pseudo answer suddenly becomes a full proof. You just scribble it down and you're done. [Corollary: wait till the last minute! You save lots of time this way.]